Open Access
Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 15, 2017
II International Conference of Computational Methods in Engineering Science (CMES’17)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 03003 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Computer Simulations Of Processes And Phenomena | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20171503003 | |
Published online | 15 December 2017 |
- A. Iványi, Hysteresis models in electromagnetic computation (Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 1997) [Google Scholar]
- D. C. Jiles, D. L. Atherton, IEEE Trans. Magn. 19, 2183 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. C. Jiles, D. L. Atherton, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 61, 48 (1986) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. C. Jiles, J. B. Thoelke, M. K. Devine, IEEE Trans. Magn. 28, 27 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. A. Philips, L. R. Dupré, J. A. Melkebeek, IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 3551 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Lederer, H. Igarashi, A. Kost, T. Honma, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 1211 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. R. Wilson, J. Neil Ross, A. D. Brown, IEEE Trans. Magn. 38, 1049 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Salvini, F. Riganti Fulginei, IEEE Trans. Magn. 41, 1100 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Chwastek, J. Szczygłowski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 314, 47 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Szewczyk, J. Phys. D : Appl. Phys. 40, 4109 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Marion, R. Scoretti, N. Siauve, M.-A. Raulet, IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 894 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Toman, G. Štumberger, D. Dolinar, IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 1098 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. P. S. Baghel, S. V. Kulkarni, IET Electr. Power Appl. 6, 689 (2012) [Google Scholar]
- R.-A. Naghizadeh, B. Vahidi, S.H Hosseinian, COMPEL 31, 1293 (2012) [Google Scholar]
- Lu Hai-Liang, Wen Xi-Shan, Lan Lei, An Yun-Zhu, Li Xiao-Ping, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 374, 502 (2015) [Google Scholar]
- M. A. Zaman, P. C. Hansen, L. T. Neustock, P. Padhy, L. Hesselink, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 093903 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Włodarski, IEEE Trans. Magn. 39, 1990 (2003) [Google Scholar]
- A. Benabou, J. V. Leite, S. Clénet, C. Simão, N. Sadowski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, e1034 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Chwastek, J. Phys. D : Appl. Phys. 42, 165002 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zb. Gmyrek, Int. J. Numer. Model. 27, 199 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. I. Koltermann, L. A. Righi, J. P. A. Bastos, R. Carlson, N. Sadowski, N. J. Batistela, Physica B 275, 233 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. A. Righi, N. Sadowski, R. Carlson, J. P. A. Bastos, N. J. Batistela, IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 3353 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. I. Koltermann, J. P. A. Bastos, N. Sadowski, N. J. Batistela, A. Kost, L. Jänicke, K. Miethner, IEEE Trans. Magn. 38, 897 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P. Andrei, A. Stancu, H. Hauser, P. Fulmek, J. Optoelectr. Adv. Mater. 9, 1137 (2007) [Google Scholar]
- M. Sablik, D. C. Jiles, IEEE Trans. Magn. 29, 2113 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. J. Stevens, NDT&E 33, 111 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jianwei Li, Minqiang Xu, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 063918 (2011) [Google Scholar]
- A. Jakubas, P. Gębara, S. Seme, A. Gnatowski, K. Chwastek, Acta Phys. Pol. A 131, 1289 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Venkataraman, P. S. Krishnaprasad, Proc. 37th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, Tampa, USA, 1998, doi:10.1109/CDC.1998.757777 [Google Scholar]
- N. Sadowski, N. J. Batistela, J. P. A. Bastos, M. Lajoie-Mazenc, IEEE Trans. Magn. 38, 797 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Chwastek, J. Szczygłowski, Przegl. Elektrotechn. 12, 145 (2008) [Google Scholar]
- R. Marion, N. Siauve, M.-A. Raulet, L. Krähenbühl, K. Chwastek, J. Szczygłowski, W. Wilczyński, A comparison of identification techniques for the Jiles-Atherton model of hysteresis, presented at XX EPNC 2-4.07.2008, Lille, France [Google Scholar]
- S. E. Zirka, Yu. I. Moroz, R. G. Harrison, K. Chwastek, J. Appl. Phys. 112, 043916 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. D. Mayergoyz, Mathematical models of hysteresis, Springer, New York, 1991 [Google Scholar]
- B. Vaseghi, D. Mathekga, S. Rahman, A. M. Knight, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 1637 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- E. Della Torre, J. Oti, G. Kadár, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 3052 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. H. B. Deane, IEEE Trans. Magn. 30, 2795 (1994) [Google Scholar]
- H. Toms, R. Colclaser, M. Krefta, IEEE Trans. Magn. 2, 982 (2008) [Google Scholar]
- J. B. Padilha, P. Kuo-Peng, N. Sadowski, J. V. Leite, N. J. Batistela, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 442, 8 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- http://www.zirka.dp.ua [Google Scholar]
- D. C. Jiles, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 5849 (1994) [Google Scholar]
- Liu Qingyou, Luo Xu, Zhu Haiyan, Liu Jianxun, Han Yiwei, Chinese Phys. B 26 (7), 077502 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- K. Chwastek, Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 15, 95 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- T. Kleineberg, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 166, 315 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Steentjes, K. Chwastek, M. Petrun, D. Dolinar, K. Hameyer, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 7300804 (2014), doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2014.2323250 [Google Scholar]
- R. Jastrzębski, K. Chwastek, I. Biondić, K. Miličević, Acta Phys. Pol. A 131, 1228 (2017) [Google Scholar]
- A. J. Bergqvist, Physica B 233, 342 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Henrotte, A. Nicolet, K. Hameyer, COMPEL 25, 71 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. François-Lavet, F. Henrotte, L. Stainer, L. Noels, C. Geuzaine, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 246, 243 (2013) [Google Scholar]
- E. R. Madelung, Ann. Phys. 17, 861 (1905) [Google Scholar]
- S. E. Zirka, Yu. I. Moroz, IEEE Trans. Magn. 31, 3509 (1995) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. E. Zirka, Yu. I. Moroz, IEEE Trans. Magn. 35, 2090 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Cohen, Rheol. Acta 30, 270 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. Jedynak, Rheol. Acta 54, 29 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.