Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 15, 2017
II International Conference of Computational Methods in Engineering Science (CMES’17)
Article Number 05008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Exploitation And Machine Building
Published online 15 December 2017
  1. M. S. Kalaimagal and D. R. Sivaramakrishnan, in IJERT (2012) [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Zhang and D. P. Hong, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 16, 847 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Mautz, Geod. Ir Kartogr. 35, 18 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Siciliano, O. Khatib, Springer Handbook of Robotics (2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. C. W. Yuen, N. Balasubramaniam, and N. M. Din, in 2009 IEEE 9th Malays. Int. Conf. Commun. MICC, 857–862 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. M. Ladd, K. E. Bekris, A. P. Rudys, D. S. Wallach, L. E. Kavraki, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 20, 555 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan, in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2000 Conf. Comput. Commun. Ninet. Annu. Jt. Conf. IEEE Comput. Commun. Soc. Cat No00CH37064. 2, 775–784 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. M. Ladd, K. E. Bekris, G. Marceau, A. Rudys, D. S. Wallach, L. E. Kavraki, in IEEERSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. 1, 402–408 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Yu, P. Lou, X. Qian, and X. Wu, in 2008 ISECS Int. Colloq. Comput. Commun. Control Manag., 28–33 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Meier, P. Tanskanen, F. Fraundorfer, and M. Pollefeys, in 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. 2992–2997 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Agrawal and K. Konolige, in 18th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit. ICPR06, 1063–1068 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Mautz and S. Tilch, in 2011 Int. Conf. Indoor Position. Indoor Navig., 1–7 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Dellaert, W. Burgard, D. Fox, and S. Thrun, in Proc. 1999 IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. Cat No PR00149, 594, 2 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. M. Barrett, Analyzing and Modeling Low-Cost MEMS IMUs for Use in an Inertial Navigation System, (Worcester Polytechnic Institute 2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Cechowicz, Acta Mech. Autom. 11, 104 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Zhang, A. Bannoura, F. Höflinger, L. M. Reindl, and C. Schindelhauer, in 2013 IEEE Sens. Appl. Symp. Proc., 38–42 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S.-Y. Lee and H.-W. Yang, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 28, 425 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Ijaz, H. K. Yang, A. W. Ahmad, and C. Lee, in 2013 15th Int. Conf. Adv. Commun. Technol. ICACT, 1146–1150 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Kaniak and H. Schweinzer, in 2008 IEEE Sens., 1092–1095 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Walter and H. Schweinzer, in 2012 IEEE Int. Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf. Proc., 1571–1576 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D. Bank, IEEE Sens. J. 2, 597 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Kleeman, in Proc. 1999 IEEERSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. Hum. Environ. Friendly Robots High Intell. Emot. Quotients Cat No99CH36289, 1185–1190 vol.2. (1999) [Google Scholar]
  23. H. Elmer and H. Schweinzer, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 13, 133 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. D. Tardós, J. Neira, P. M. Newman, J. J. Leonard, Int. J. Robot. Res. 21, 311 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Fazli, L. Kleeman, Robotica 24, 433 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  26. PUI Audio Inc., [Google Scholar]
  27. Knowles Corp., [Google Scholar]
  28. A. V. Oppenheim, R. W. Schafer, J. R. Buck, Discrete-Time Signal Processing (1999) [Google Scholar]
  29. I. W. Selesnick, C. S. Burrus, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 46, 1688 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. S. N. Yao, T. Collins, P. Jančovič, Comput. Electr. Eng. 38, 811 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. J. Orfanidis, Introduction to Signal Processing (1996) [Google Scholar]
  32. R. Sorrentino, G. Bianchi, Microwave and RF Engineering (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.