EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 29 (2019) ITM Web Conf., 29 (2019) 02006 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 29, 2019
1st International Conference on Computational Methods and Applications in Engineering (ICCMAE 2018)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 14
Section Computational Methods in Mechanical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20192902006
Published online 15 October 2019
  1. Baya A., Muntean S., Campian V.C., Cuzmos A., Diaconescu M., Balan G., (2010) Experimental investigations of the unsteady flow in a Francis turbine draft tube cone, IOP Conference Series-Earth and Environmental Science 12, 012007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Muntean S., Susan-Resiga R., Câmpian V.C., Dumbravă C., Cuzmoş V. (2014) In situ unsteady pressure measurements on the draft tube cone of the Francis turbine with air injection over an extended operating range, UPB Scientific Bulletin,Series D: Mechanical Engineering 6 (3), pp.173–180. [Google Scholar]
  3. Muntean S., Baya A., Susan-Resiga R., Anton I., (2009) Numerical Flow Analysis into a Francis Turbine Runner with Medium Specific Speed at Off-Design Operating Conditions, Acta Technica Napocensis,Series: Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 52,II,p.325–334 [Google Scholar]
  4. Muntean S., Ninaci I., Susan-Resiga R., Baya A., Anton I. (2010) Numerical analysis of the flow in the old Francis runner in order to define the refurbishment strategy, UPB Scientific Bulletin,Series D: Mechanical Engineering, 72 (1) p.117–124 [Google Scholar]
  5. Negru R., Muntean S., Marsavina L., Susan-Resiga R., Pasca N., (2012) Computation of stress distribution in a Francis turbine runner induced by fluid flow, Computational Materials Science 64,p.253–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Müller, T. Staubli, R. Baumann, E. Casartelli, (2014) A case study of the fluid structure interaction of a Francis turbine, IOP.Conf.Ser.: Earth Environ.Sci. 22032053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sallaberger M., Michaud Ch., Born H., Winkler St. and Peron M. (2001) Design and Manufacturing of Francis Runners for Rehabilitation Projects, Hydro 2001, Riva del Garda [Google Scholar]
  8. Sotnikov A.A. (2001) Water Turbines at Bratsk HES: Design,Use and Upgrading, Hydrotechnical Construction, 35 (10),p.507–511. [Google Scholar]
  9. Papillon B., Gagne J.-L., Giroux S., Sabourin M. (2002) Turbine rehabilitation: Chute-des-Passes case study,HydroVision, Portland,Oregon. [Google Scholar]
  10. Muntean S., Susan-Resiga R., Goede E., Baya A., Terzi R., Tîrşi C. (2016) Scenarios for refurbishment of a hydropower plant equipped with Francis turbines, Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability, 1,30,p.1–6. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gagnon M., Tahan A., Bocher P., Thibault D., (2013) A probabilistic model for the onset of High Cycle Fatigue (HCF) crack propagation: Application to hydroelectric turbine runner. International Journal of Fatigue 47p.300–307 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gagnon M., Tahan A., Bocher P., Thibault D., (2013) On the Fatigue Reliability of Hydroelectric Francis Runners. Procedia Engineering. 66p.565–574. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gagnon M., Tahan A., Bocher P., Thibault D. (2014) Influence of load spectrum assumptions on the expected reliability of hydroelectric turbines: A case study, Structural Safety, 50,p.1–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fisher R.K., Seidel U., Grosse G., Gfeller W., Klinger R., (2002) A case study in resonant hydroelastic vibration: the causes of runner cracks and the solutions implemented for the Xiaolangdi hydroelectric project, Proceedings of the XXI IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Lausanne,Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  15. Frunz–verde D., Muntean S., SallabergerM℃rginean G., Câmpian V.C., Mar⅟avina L., (2010) Failure analysis of a Francis turbine runner, IOP Conf.Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 12(l),012115 p.1–9. [Google Scholar]
  16. Luna-Raírez A., Campos-Amezcua A., Dorantes-Gómez O., Mazur-Czerwiec Z., Muñoz-Quezada R., (2016) Failure analysis of runner blades in a Francis hydraulic turbine—Case study, Engineering Failure Analysis, 59,p314–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huth H.-J. (2005) Fatigue Design of Hydraulic Turbine Runners,PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU),Trondheim,Norway, [Google Scholar]
  18. Carpinteri A., Brighenti R., Huth H.-J., Vantadori S. (2005) Fatigue growth of a surface crack in a welded T-joint International Journal of Fatigue 27 (1) pp.59–69. [Google Scholar]
  19. Carpinteri A., Ronchei C., Scorza D., Vantadori S. (2015) Fracture mechanics based approach to fatigue analysis of welded joints, Engineering Failure Analysis, 49, pp.67–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pasca N., Marsavita L., Negru R., Muntean S. (2013) Estimation of the Stress Intensity Factor for 3D Cracked T-Joint.In: Jarmai K., Farkas J.(eds) Design,Fabrication and Economy of Metal Structures, pp.273–280.SpringerISBN: 978-3-642-36690-1 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36691-8_41 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saeed R.A., Galybin A.N., Popov V., (2010) Modelling of flow-induced stresses in a Francis turbine runner, Advanced in Engineering Software, 41,p.1245–1255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. IEC 60193 (1999). Hydraulic Turbines.Storage Pumps and Pump-Turbines — Model Acceptance Tests. International Electrotechnical Commission (2nd ed.)Geneva,Switzerland. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.