Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 34, 2020
International Conference on Applied Mathematics and Numerical Methods – third edition (ICAMNM 2020)
Article Number 03012
Number of page(s) 9
Section Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and Geometry
Published online 03 December 2020
  1. L.M. Bates, Personal communication. [Google Scholar]
  2. L.M. Bates, and J. M. Nester, On D’ Alembert’s principle, Communications in Mathematics 19(1), 57-72 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Benenti, Geometrical aspects of the dynamics of non-holonomic systems, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Pol. Torino 54, 203–212 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Bejancu, Nonholonomic mechanical systems and Kaluza–Klein theory, Journal of Nonlinear Science 22, 213–233 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Bejancu A., H.R. Farran, Foliations and Geometric Structures (Springer, Series: Mathematics and Its Applications Vol. 580, 2006) 580 pp. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. M. Bloch, Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control (Vol. 24, Springer, 2003) 503 pp. [Google Scholar]
  7. I. Bucataru and R. Miron, Finsler-Lagrange geometry: Applications to dynamical systems (Editura Academiei Romane, Bucuresti, 2007) 264 pp. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. R. Flannery, The enigma of nonholonomic constraints, American Journal of Physics 73(3), 265-272 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Y.-X. Guo, J. Li-Yan and Y. Ying, Symmetries of mechanical systems with nonlinear nonholonomic constraints, Chinese Physics 10, p. 181 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Grabowska and J. Grabowski, Variational calculus with constraints on general algebroids, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 41, 175-204 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. M. H. Kobayashi, W. M. Oliva, A note on the conservation of energy and volume in the setting of nonholonomic mechanical systems, Qualitative Theory of Dynamical Systems 4, 383–411 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. O. Krupková, Mechanical systems with nonholonomic constraints, Journal of Mathematical Physics 38, 5098–5126 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Lang, Differential and Riemannian Manifolds (Springer Verlag, New York, 1995) 378 pp. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. de León M., A historical review on nonholonomic mechanics, Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas Y Naturales (Serie A: Matematicas) 105 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  15. M. de León, D. Martín de Diego and M. Vaquero, A Hamilton-Jacobi theory on Poisson manifolds, Journal of Geometric Mechanics 6, 121–140 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S.-M. Li and J. Berakdar, A generalization of the Chetaev condition for nonlinear nonholonomic constraints: The velocity-determined virtual displacement approach, Reports on Mathematical Physics 63, 179–189 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. M. Marle, Kinematic and geometric constraints, servomechanisms and control of mechanical systems, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Pol. Torino 54, 353–364 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  18. C. M. Marle, Various approaches to conservative and nonconservative nonholonomic systems, Reports on Mathematical Physics 42, 211–229 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Molino, Riemannian Foliations (Birkhäuser, Progr. Math. 73, 1988) 356 pp. [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Popescu, C. Ida, Nonlinear constraints in nonholonomic mechanics, Journal of Geometric Mechanics 6(4), 527-547 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Popescu and M. Popescu, Lagrangians adapted to submersions and foliations, Differential Geom. Appl. 27, 171–178 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Swaczyna, Several examples of nonholonomic mechanical systems, Communications in Mathematics 19(1), 27–56 (2011). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.