Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 35, 2020
International Forum “IT-Technologies for Engineering Education: New Trends and Implementing Experience” (ITEE-2019)
Article Number 06004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Legislative and Regulatory Regulation of Engineering Digital Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20203506004
Published online 09 December 2020
  1. A.A. Aleksandrov, Fang Ke, A.V. Proletarsky & K.A. Neusypin, Conception complex continuous education with innovative information technologies, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Education and Education Management (EEM 2012), pp. 374-378 (2012). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  2. E.V. Smirnova, A.A. Dobrjkov, A.P. Karpenko & V.V. Syuzev, Mentally structured educational technology and engineers preparation quality management, Communications in Computer and Information Science, 754, pp. 119-132 (2017). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A.A. Aleksandrov, K.A. Neusipin, A.V. Proletarsky & K. Fang, Innovation development trends of modern management systems of educational organizations, Proceeding of 2012 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, ICIII 2012, 3, pp. 187-189 (2012). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  4. M.G. Sergeeva, Y.A. Chighovskaya-Nazarova, S.V. Dmitrichenkova, S.Y. Papirovskaya, V. A. Chauzova & I. S. Andryushchenko, Effectiveness verification of the application of imitation methods of education in the training of a specialist, Espacios, 39(38), 11 (2018). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  5. R.Sh. Akhmadieva, L.N. Ignatova, G I. Bolkina, A.A. Soloviev, D.V. Gagloev, M.V. Korotkova, V. I. Burenina, An attitude of citizens to state control over the internet traffic, Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 13(1), em82 (2018). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  6. N.A. Serdyukova, V.I. Serdyukov, S.S. Neustroev & S.I. Shishkina, Assessing the reliability of automated knowledge control results, IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, pp. 1425-1428 (2019). doi:10.1109/EDUCON.2019.8725173 Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  7. P.H. Ho, T.H. Vo & N.A.T. Nguyen, Data warehouse designing for Vietnamese textual document-based plagiarism detection system, 2017 International Conference on System Science and Engineering, ICSSE 2017, 8030873, pp. 239-243 (2017). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  8. A.Y. Gasparyan, B. Nurmashev, B. Seksenbayev, V.I. Trukhachev, E I. Kostyukova & G.D. Kitas, Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies, Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32(8), pp. 1220-1227 (2017). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Ďuračík, E. Kršák, P. Hrkút, Current Trends in Source Code Analysis, Plagiarism Detection and Issues of Analysis Big Datasets, Procedia Engineering, 192, pp. 136-141 (2017). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M.N. Halgamuge, The use and analysis of anti-plagiarism software: Turnitin tool for formative assessment and feedback, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), pp. 895-909 (2017). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Akbar & M. Picard, Understanding plagiarism in Indonesia from the lens of plagiarism policy: Lessons for universities, International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(1), p. 7 (2019). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Wang, Plagiarism in online literature publishing in China: why is it so rampant?, Online Information Review, 43(4), pp. 551-564 (2019). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A.M. Fazilatfar, S.E. Elhambakhsh & H. Allami, An Investigation of the Effects of Citation Instruction to Avoid Plagiarism in EFL Academic Writing Assignments, SAGE Open, 8(2) (2018). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Levine & V. Pazdernik, Evaluation of a four-prong anti-plagiarism program and the incidence of plagiarism: a five-year retrospective study, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), pp. 1094-1105 (2018). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Awasthi, Plagiarism and academic misconduct: A systematic review, DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 39(2), pp. 94-100 (2019). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. P.K. Suresh Kumar, Similarity index of doctoral theses submitted to universities in Kerala: An investigation, Library Philosophy and Practice, p. 2130 (2019). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  17. Q. Li & C. Zhang, Research on algorithm of program code similarity detection, 2017 International Conference on Computer Systems, Electronics and Control, ICCSEC 2017, 8446728, pp. 1289-1292 (2018). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  18. N.I. Martishina, “Anti-plagiarism” system in self-regulation of scientific activity, Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, 27(6), pp. 50-57 (2018). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Kunschak, Multiple uses of anti-plagiarism software, Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), pp. 60-69 (2018). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]
  20. D.B. Dasari & K.V.G. Rao, Context similarity strategy for text data plagiarism detection, International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(2), pp. 14-17 (2018). Retrieved from www.scopus.com [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.