Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 39, 2021
CIFEM'2020 – 3ème édition du Colloque International sur la Formation et l’Enseignement des Mathématiques et des sciences
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 15
Section Sciences de l’éducation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20213904001
Published online 11 May 2021
  1. ONU. Convention des Nations Unies relative aux droits des personnes handicapées (ONU, New York, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Prud’homme, R. Vienneau, S. Ramel, & N. Rousseau. La légitimité de la diversité en éducation : réflexion sur l’inclusion. Éducation et francophonie, 39(2), 6–22 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Tremblay. Inclusion scolaire - Dispositifs et pratiques pédagogiques (De Boeck, Louvain-la-Neuve, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Rousseau, M. Point, R. Vienneau, M.E. Desmarais & K. Desmarais. Les apports et les limites liés aux pratiques inclusives et la place de la collaboration dans ces pratiques : une méta synthèse. Revue suisse des sciences de l’éducation, 39(1), 21–40 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Farrell. School psychologists making inclusion a reality for all. School Psychology International, 25, 5–1 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Archbold & C. Mayer. Deaf Education: The Impact of Cochlear Implantation?. Deafness & Education International, 14(1), 2–15 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Golaszewski. Teaching Students Who Are Hard-of-Hearing or Deaf: Inclusive School. Empan, 3, 96–101 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Savage, J. Savage, L. Evans & J. Potter. Language and reading development in profoundly hearing impaired children Intelligence, learning and communication factors : A review. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 5, 62–73 (1986). [Google Scholar]
  9. C.R. Musselman, P.H. Lindsay & A.K. Wilson. The effect of mothers' communication mode on language development in preschool deaf children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9(2), 185–204 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Castles & M. Coltheart. Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read ? Cognition, 91(1), 77–111 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Alegria. La lecture chez l’enfant sourd : conditions d’acquisition. Langage & Pratiques, 23, 27–46 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Niederberger. Apprentissage de la lecture-écriture chez les enfants sourds. Enfance, 59(3), 254–262 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  13. J.P. Astolfi & M. Develay. La didactique des sciences (PUF, Paris, 1989). [Google Scholar]
  14. G. De Vecchi & A. Giordan. L’enseignement scientifique : comment faire pour que ça marche (Z’éditions, Paris, 1996). [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Giordan. Les origines du savoir (Delachaux et Niestlé, Paris, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Santini. Les conceptions des élèves: des données empiriques aux résultats inférés. Questionner l’implicite d’un objet des didactiques à partir des conceptions du mécanisme sismique. In C. Cohen-Azria & N. Sayac (eds) Questionner l’implicite. Les méthodes de recherche en didactiques, 227–242 (Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, Lille, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Robardet & J.C. Guillaud. Eléments d’épistémologie et de didactique des sciences physiques (IUFM, Grenoble, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Newsom. Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education Vol.1 (Oxford University Press, USA, 2003). [Google Scholar]
  19. B.O. Molander, S. Pedersen & K. Norell. Deaf pupils' reasoning about scientific phenomena: School science as a framework for understanding or as fragments of factual knowledge. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 6(3), 200–211 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Vosganoff, L.E. Paatsch & D.M. Toe. The mathematical and science skills of students who are deaf or hard of hearing educated in inclusive settings. Deafness & Education International, 13(2), 70–88 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  21. L.P. Rivard. A Review of Writing to Learn in Science: Implications for Practice and Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 69–83 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  22. D.H. Kidd, A.L. Madsen & C.E. Lamb. Mathematics vocabulary: Performance of residential deaf students. School Science and Mathematics, 93(8), 418–421 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  23. H.G. Lang & J.A. Albertini. Construction of meaning in the authentic science writing of deaf students. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 6(4), 258–284 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  24. H.G. Lang & D. Steely. Web-based science instruction for deaf students: What research says to the teacher. Instructional Science, 31(4-5), 277–298 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  25. B.R. Xavier, M.R. Voelzke & O.R. Ferreira. Voices coming out of hands: Teaching Astronomy for the deaf. RECMa, 10, 257–276 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Zamfirov, S. Saeva & T. Popov. Innovation in teaching deaf students’ physics and astronomy in Bulgaria. Physics education, 42(1), 98–104 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Egelston-Dodd, S. Ting. Video-Tutorials for Tech Sign Vocabulary in Astronomy. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 12(1), 21–26 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Lamouchi Chebbi, L’Univers : est-ce intéressant ? Une question de rapport au savoir. In A. Naceur & S. Masmoudi (eds) Cognition, Emotion & Motivation, 478–492 (Edition du centre national d’innovation pédagogique, Tunis, 2007). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.