EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 (2022) ITM Web Conf., 41 (2022) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 41, 2022
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.2)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 20
Section General Track
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20224101002
Published online 08 February 2022
  1. Forrester Wave (2017). Artificial intelligence with the human touch. blend ai with human agents to improve both customer and agent satisfaction. pp 1-14. Available at: https://www.genesys.com [Google Scholar]
  2. Jarrahi, M.H. (2018. Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making, Business Horizons, 61(4), pp.577-586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell, M. (2016. 20 years later, humans still no match for computers on the chessboard. NPR. Available at https://www.npr.org/ [Google Scholar]
  4. Grundner, L., Neuhofer, B. (2021. The bright and dark sides of artificial intelligence: A futures perspective on tourist destination experiences, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 19, pp.100511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maglio, P., Lim, C. (2019. Service-dominant logic, service science and the role of robots as actors. In S. L. Vargo, & R. F. Lusch (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Service-Dominant Logic. [Google Scholar]
  6. Polese F., Payne A., Frow P., Sarno D., Nenonen S. (2021. Emergence and phase transitions in service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research,127, 25-34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaartemo V, Helkkula A. (2018. A systematic review of artificial intelligence and robots in value co-creation: current status and future research avenues. J. of Creating Value, 4(2), pp.211-228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shilton K. (2018, Values and ethics in human-computer interaction, now. Boston. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pakkala D., Spohrer, D. (2019. Digital service: technological agency in service SYSTEMS. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  10. Prahalad, C. K., Ramaswamy, V. (2002. The co-creation connection. Strategy and business, 50-61. [Google Scholar]
  11. Maglio, P. P., Matlock, T., Gould, S. J., Koons, D., Campbell, C. S. (2002. On understanding discourse in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Vol.24, N.24. [Google Scholar]
  12. Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V. (2004, Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 5-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vargo, S.L., Maglio, P.P., Akaka, M. A. (2008. On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European management journal, 26(3), 145-152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grönroos, C. (2006. Adopting a service logic for marketing. Marketing theory, 6(3), pp.317-333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., Frow, P. (2008. Managing the co-creation of value. J. of the academy of marketing science, 36(1), pp.83-96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., Burkhard, K. A., Goul, M., Smith-Daniels, V., ... Rabinovich, E. (2010. Moving forward and making a difference: Research priorities for the science of service. Journal of Service Research, 13(1), pp.4–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Glückler, J., Hammer, I. (2011. A pragmatic service typology: Capturing the distinctive dynamics of services in time and space. The Service Industries Journal, 31(6), pp.941–947. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ramaswamy, V. (2011. It’s about human experiences… and beyond, to co-creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), pp.195-196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., Gruber, T. (2011. Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 39, pp.327–339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grönroos, C., Voima, P. (2013. Critical service logic: making sense of value creation and cocreation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 41, pp.133–150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lusch, R.F., Nambisan, S. (2015, “Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective”, MIS Quarterly, 39(1), pp.155-175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Breidbach, C.F., Maglio, P.P. (2016. Technology-enabled value co-creation: An empirical analysis of actors, resources, and practices. Industrial Marketing Management, 56, pp.73-85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Breidbach, C.F., Ranjan, S. (2017. How do Fintech Service Platforms Facilitate Value Co-Creation? An Analysis of Twitter Data. In ICIS. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nenonen, S., Storbacka, K. (2018. Actors, Actor Engagement and Value Creation, Journal of Creating Value, 4(2), pp.196–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schüritz, R., Farrell, K., Wixom, B.W., Satzger, G. (2019. Value co-creation in data-driven services: towards a deeper understanding of the joint sphere. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hodapp, D., Hawlitschek, F., Kramer, D. (2019. Value Co-Creation in Nascent Platform Ecosystems: A Delphi Study in the Context of the Internet of Things. In ICIS. [Google Scholar]
  27. Buhalis, D., Harwood, T., Bogicevic, V., Viglia, G., Beldona, S., Hofacker, C. (2019. Technological disruptions in services: lessons from tourism and hospitality. Journal of Service Management 30(4), pp-484-506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Durall, E., Bauters, M., Hietala, I., Leinonen, T., Kapros, E. (2020. Co-creation and co-design in technology-enhanced learning: Innovating science learning outside the classroom. Interaction Design and Architecture (s), 42, pp.202-226. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rusthollkarhu, S., Hautamaki, Pia., Aarikka-Stenroos, L. (2020, Value (co-)creation in B2B sales ecosystems. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing: 9. [Google Scholar]
  30. Neuhofer, B., Magnus, B., Celuch, K. (2020, The impact of artificial intelligence on event experiences: a scenario technique approach. Electronic Markets: 17. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sjodin, D., Parida, V., Kohtamäki, M., Wincent, J. (2020. An agile co-creation process for digital servitization: A micro-service innovation approach. J. of Business Research, 112, pp.478-491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Singh, J., Nambisan, S., Bridge, G., Kai-Uwe Brock, J. (2020, One-Voice Strategy for Customer Engagement. Journal of Service Research: 24. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hollebeek, L. D., Clark, M.K., Mackyl, K. (2020, Demystifying consumer digital cocreated value: Social presence theory-informed framework and propositions. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing-English Edition: 19. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jaakkola, E. (2020. Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1-2), pp.18-26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Huang, M.H., Rust, R.T. (2018. Artificial Intelligence in Service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), pp.155–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Davenport, T.H., Kirby, J. (2016. Just how smart are smart machines? MIT Sloan Management Review, 57(3), pp.21-25. [Google Scholar]
  37. Storbacka, K., Brodie, R.J., Bohmann, T., Maglio, P.P., Nenonen, S. (2016, Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation, Journal of Business Research, 69(8), pp. 3008-3017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vargo, S.L., Koskela-Huotari, K., Edvardsson, B., Baron, S., Reynoso J., Colurcio, M. (2017, A Systems Perspective on Markets: Building a Research Agenda, Journal of Business Research,79, pp.260-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Peters, L.D., Nenonen, S., Polese, F., Frow, P., Payne, A. (2020, Viability mechanisms in market systems: prerequisites for market shaping, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, pp 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  40. Polese, F. (2018, Successful value co-creation exchanges – a VSA contribution, in Barile, S., Pellicano, M., Polese, F. (Eds.), Social dynamics in a Systems perspective, ed. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  41. Polese, F., Pels, J., Tronvoll, B., Bruni, R., Carrubbo, L. (2017a). A4A relationships. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, vol.27, Is.05, pp.1040-1056. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Polese, F., Carrubbo, L., Bruni, R., Maione, G. (2017b), “The viable system perspective of actors in eco-systems”, in The TQM Journal, Vol. 29 Issue: 6, pp.783-799, ISSN 1754-2731 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Polese F., Carrubbo, L., Caputo, F., Megaro, A. (2018a), Co-creation in action: An acid test of smart service systems viability, in Proceedings of International Conference on Exploring Service Science, IESS2018, pp.151-164 [Google Scholar]
  44. Barile, S., Carrubbo, L., Iandolo, F. Caputo, F. (2013, From ‘EGO’ to ‘ECO’ in B2B relationships, in jbm-Journal of Business Market Management, 6(4), pp.228-253. [Google Scholar]
  45. Vargo, S.L. Lusch, R.F. (2011, It’s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market, Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), pp.181-187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Polese, F., Sarno, D., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M. (2018b), From B2B to A4A: an integrated model for viable value co-creation, Mercati e Competitività, pp.135-161 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Badinelli, R., Barile, S., Ng, I., Polese, F., Saviano, M., Di Nauta, P. (2012, Viable Service Systems and Decision Making in Service Management, Journal of Service Management, 23(4), pp.498-526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pels, J., Brodie, R. Polese, F. (2012, Value co-creation, using the Viable Systems Approach to draw implications from Organizational Theories, in Mercati & Competitività, 1, pp.19-38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Barile, S., Pels, J., Polese, F. Saviano, M. (2012, An Introduction to the Viable Systems Approach and its Contribution to Marketing, J. of Business Market Management, 5(2), pp.54-78. [Google Scholar]
  50. Barile S., Piciocchi P., Bassano C., Spohrer J., Pietronudo M.C. (2019. Re-defining the role of artificial intelligence (ai) in wiser service systems in Ahram T.Z. (ed.) AHFE 2018, AISC, 787,159–170. Springer International Publishing AG, Springer Nature. [Google Scholar]
  51. Echeverri, P., Skålén, P. (2011. Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing theory, 11(3), pp.351-373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shah, N., Levy, A.E., Moriates, C., Arora, V.M. (2015. Wisdom of the crowd: bright ideas and innovations from the teaching value and choosing wisely challenge. Academic Medicine, 90(5), pp.624-628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Barile S., Polese F. (2010. Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Service Science, 2(1-2) pp.21-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mahajan, G., Bruni, R., Tregua, M., Carrubbo, L., Cosimato, S. (2020, Value perception in service: the trap of misunderstandings, in Proceedings of XVII SIM Conference. [Google Scholar]
  55. Dyer, J.H., Singh, H., Hesterly, W.S. (2018. The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), pp.3140-3162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Giddens, A. (1984, The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration, Univ of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  57. Granovetter, M. (1985, Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness”, The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), pp.481–510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Bratman, M.E. (1987, Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  59. Iandolo, F., Barile, S., Armenia, S., Carrubbo, L. (2018. A system dynamics perspective on a viable systems approach definition for sustainable value. Sustainability Science, 13(5), pp.1245-1263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N. (1992. Strategic Alignment: A Model for Organizational Transformation through Information Technology, in Transforming Organizations, T. A. Kochan and M. Useem (eds.), Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  61. Barile S., Lusch R.F., Reynoso J., Saviano M., Spohrer J. (2016a). Systems, networks, and ecosystems in service research, Journal of Service Management, 27(4), pp.652-674. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  62. Gummesson, E., Sarno, D., Carrubbo L., Sirianni C.A. (2019, Contributing to sustainable healthcare systems with case theory, Int. Journal of Business and Management, 14(1), pp.34-47. [Google Scholar]
  63. Chandler J.D., Vargo S.L. (2011. Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), pp.35-49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Parsons T. (1971, The system of modern societies, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs. [Google Scholar]
  65. Walletzký L., Buhnova, B. Carrubbo, L. (2018 Value-driven conceptualization of services in the smart city: a layered approach, In Social Dynamics in a Systems Perspective pp.85-98. Springer, Cham. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Walletzký L., Carrubbo, L., Toli, A.M. Ge, M. Romanovská, F. (2020, Multi-contextual View to Smart City Architecture, in Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering, AHFE 2020 pp.306-312. [Google Scholar]
  67. Castillo, D., Canhoto, A.I., Said, E. (2020, The dark side of AI-powered service interactions: exploring the process of co-destruction from the customer perspective. The Service Industries Journal. pp.1-26. [Google Scholar]
  68. Dragoicea M., Walletzký, L. Carrubbo, L., Badr, N.G., Toli, A.M., Romanovská, F. Ge, M. (2020, Service Design for Resilience: A Multi-Contextual Modeling Perspective, IEEE Access 8, pp.185526-185543. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Khan, N., Alsaqer, M., Shah, H. … Salehian, S. (2018, The 10 Vs, Issues and Challenges of Big Data, in 2018 Int. Conference. [Google Scholar]
  70. Díaz-Méndez, M., Gummesson, E. (2012. Value co-creation and university teaching quality: Consequences for the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Journal of Service Management, 23(4), pp.571-592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  71. Jaakkola, E., Alexander, M. (2014, The role of customer engagement behavior in value co-creation: a service system perspective”, in Journal of Service Research, 17(3), pp.247-261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  72. Alexander, M., Jaakkola, E., Hollebeek, L. (2018, Zooming out: actor engagement beyond the dyadic, Journal of Service Management, 29(3), pp.333-351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  73. Brodie, R.J., Fehrer, J.A., Jaakkola, E., Conduit, J. (2019, Actor engagement in networks: defining the conceptual domain, Journal of Service Research, 22(2), pp.173-188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  74. Polese, F., Di Nauta, P. (2013, A Viable Systems Approach to Relationship Management in S-D Logic and Service Science. Business Administration Review, 73(2), pp.113-129. [Google Scholar]
  75. Watzlawick P. (1976, La realtà della realtà, Astrolabio, Roma. [Google Scholar]
  76. Barile S., Polese, F. Carrubbo, L., Caputo, F., Walletzký, L. (2018, Determinants for Value Co- creation and Collaborative paths in Complex Service Systems: A Focus on (Smart) Cities, Service Science 10(4), pp.379-477. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  77. Zwass, V. (2010. Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. International journal of electronic commerce, 15(1), pp.11-48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  78. Bock, D.E., Wolter, J.S., Ferrell, O.C. (2020, Artificial intelligence: disrupting what we know about services, Journal of Services Marketing,34(3), pp.317-334. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  79. Polese, F., Barile, S., Loia, V., Carrubbo, L. (2018c), The demolition of Service Scientists’ cultural-boundaries, in Handbook of Service Science II ed. Springer, pp. 773-784. [Google Scholar]
  80. Schulz, C., Korte, W., Moghaddam, Y., Cuartas-Acosta, A., Spohrer, J., Hüsing, T., Probst, L., (2021. Upskilling and reskilling in the post-covid era: fostering new services and jobs creation: three scenarios for 2030 : final report. Available on-line at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/cd4d4f61-4c16-11ec-91ac-01aa75ed71a1/language-en?s=09 [Google Scholar]
  81. de Fine Licht, K., & de Fine Licht, J. (2020. AI, transparency, and public decision-making. AI & society, 35(4), 917-926. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.