Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 47, 2022
2022 2nd International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control, Automation and Robotics (CCCAR2022)
Article Number 03038
Number of page(s) 11
Section Control Technology and Robotics Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20224703038
Published online 23 June 2022
  1. K. Fang, S. Li, R.K. Ye, et al. New progress in Global Climate Governance – a summary of research on regional carbon emission rights allocation [J]. Progress in climate change research, 2018, 14 (5): 340-347. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brazil in Response to the Berlin Mandate. Proposed elements of a protocol to the united nations framework convention on climate change[EB/OL]. [2019-01-13]. [Google Scholar]
  3. Acar, S.; Söderholm, P.; Brännlund, R. Convergence of per capita carbon dioxide emissions: Implications and meta-analysis. Clim. Policy 2018, 18: 512–525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhou, P.; Wang, M. Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review. Ecol. Econ. 2016, 125: 47–59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chakravarty, S.; Chikkatur, A.; De Coninck, H.; Pacala, S.; Socolow, R.; Tavoni, M. Sharing global CO2 emission reductions among one billion high emitters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106: 11884–11888. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou, X.; Guan, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, M. Allocation and simulation study of carbon emission quotas among China’s provinces in 2020. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24: 7088–7113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bian, Y.; Yu, Z.; Zeng, X.; Feng, J.; He, C. Achieving China’s long-term carbon emission abatement targets: A perspective from regional disparity. Sustainability 2018, 10: 4244. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhong, Z.; Jiang, L.; Zhou, P. Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective. Energy 2018, 147: 858–875. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang, B.; Liu, C.; Su, Y.; Jing, X. The allocation of carbon intensity reduction target by 2020 among industrial sectors in China. Sustainability 2017, 9: 148. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhao, R.; Min, N.; Geng, Y.; He, Y. Allocation of carbon emissions among industries/sectors: An emissions intensity reduction constrained approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142: 3083–3094. [Google Scholar]
  11. Martin, R.; Muuls, M.; Wagner, U.J. The Impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on Regulated Firms: What Is the Evidence after Ten Years? Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2016, 10: 129–148. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhou, P., Sun, Z.R., Zhou, D.Q. Optimal path for controlling CO2 emissions in China:a perspective efficiency analysis. Energy Econ 2014,45: 99–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Filar, J.A., Gaertner, P.S.. A regional allocation of world CO2 emission reductions.Math. Comput. Simul.1997,43: 269–275. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiu, Y.H., Lin, J.C., Su, W.N., Liu, J.K. An efficiency evaluation of the EU’s allocation of carbon emission allowances. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plann. Policy.2015, 10 (2): 192–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Luzzati, T., Gucciardi, G., A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: an illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU countries. Ecol.Econ,2015, 113: 25–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Wang, Y. Cheng, C. Yu, Y. Dong. Provincial decomposition of China’s carbon emission rights under the constraints of carbon intensity targets in 2020 and 2030. Chinese Environmental Science, 2018, 38(8): 3180–3188. [Google Scholar]
  17. X.Z. Pan, H.L. Wang. Evaluation and comparison of independent emission reduction efforts of major countries under the Paris Agreement [J]. China’s population, resources and environment, 2018, 28(9): 8-15. [Google Scholar]
  18. Saran, Shyam. Global Governance and Climate Change. Global Governance: A Review Multilateralism and International Institutions, 2009, (15): 4. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Cao. Reconciling Human Development and Climate Protection: Perspectives from Developing Countries on Post - 2012 International Climate Change Policy [C/OL]. 2008, [2010-6-21]. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.