EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 51 (2023) ITM Web Conf., 51 (2023) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 51, 2023
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.3)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 14
Section Service Innovation and Inclusion
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20235104002
Published online 07 February 2023
  1. M. Corcuff et al., “Organizations’ Strategies to Improve Implementation of Universal Accessibility Principles: Protocol for a Scoping Review,” JMIR Research Protocols, 11, no. 7, p. e33641, (Jul. 2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. N. Mohtar and N. G. Badr, “Digital Bridge or Tradeoff: Telehealth Adoption and Healthcare Service Quality. A Scoping Review,” in Sustainable Digital Transformation, Cham, (2023), pp. 253–268. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Carnemolla, S. Robinson, and K. Lay, “Towards inclusive cities and social sustainability: A scoping review of initiatives to support the inclusion of people with intellectual disability in civic and social activities,” City, Culture and Society, 25, p. 100398, (Jun. 2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Nguyen, “Digital Inclusion,” in Handbook of Social Inclusion: Research and Practices in Health and Social Sciences, P. Liamputtong, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, (2022), pp. 265–279. [Google Scholar]
  5. N. G. Badr, & M. K. Asmar, Meta Principles of Technology Accessibility Design for Users with Learning Disabilities: Towards Inclusion of the Differently Enabled. In Exploring Digital Ecosystems (pp. 195-209). Springer, Cham. (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Dowling, B. Kelly, & K., Winter, Disabled Children and Young People who are Looked After. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Malhotra, V. Manchanda, A. Bhilwar, and A. Basu, “Designing inclusive smart cities of the future: the Indian context,” (2021), pp. 631–659. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. L. Vargo and R. F. Lusch, “Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution,” J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., 36, no. 1, pp. 1–10, (Mar. 2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Polese, C. Mele, and E. Gummesson, “Value co-creation as a complex adaptive process,” Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27, pp. 00–00, (Jul. 2017). [Google Scholar]
  10. H. M. Kim, S. Sabri, & A. Kent, Smart cities as a platform for technological and social innovation in productivity, sustainability, and livability: A conceptual framework. In Smart Cities for Technological and Social Innovation (pp. 9-28). Academic Press. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Baker, & A. Mehmood, Social innovation and the governance of sustainable places. Local Environment, 20(3),321-334. (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Yigitcanlar et al., “Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework,” Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 81, pp. 145–160, (Nov. 2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Spohrer and P. P. Maglio, “The Emergence of Service Science: Toward Systematic Service Innovations to Accelerate Co-Creation of Value,” Production and Operations Management, 17, no. 3, pp. 238–246, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Kolotouchkina, C. Barroso, and J. Sánchez, “Smart cities, the digital divide, and people with disabilities,” Cities, 123, p. 103613, (Apr. 2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Dickson, “Multilevel Governance and the Implementation of Inclusion Policy for Older Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Canada,” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, no. 2, pp. 183–192, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Stringer, A. L. Terry, B. L. Ryan, and A. Pike, “Patient-centred primary care of adults with severe and profound intellectual and developmental disabilities: Patient-caregiver-physician relationship,” Can Fam Physician, 64, no. Suppl 2, pp. S63–S69, (Apr. 2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. P. B. Dressler, T. K. Nguyen, E. J. Moody, S. L. Friedman, and L. Pickler, “Use of Transition Resources by Primary Care Providers for Youth With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,” Intellect Dev Disabil, 56, no. 1, pp. 56–68, (Feb. 2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Samways, P. Heslop, and S. Dowling, “Self-reported explanations for self-injury by people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review of qualitative studies,” International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, pp. 1–15, (Jul. 2022). [Google Scholar]
  19. S. van der Veen, N. Evans, M. Huisman, P. Welch Saleeby, and G. Widdershoven, “Toward a paradigm shift in healthcare: using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the capability approach (CA) jointly in theory and practice,” Disabil Rehabil, pp. 1–8, (Jun. 2022). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Coulter and J. Oldham, “Person-centred care: what is it and how do we get there?,” Future Hosp J, 3, no. 2, pp. 114–116, (Jun. 2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. I. M. Busch, F. Moretti, G. Travaini, A. W. Wu, and M. Rimondini, “Humanization of Care: Key Elements Identified by Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Providers. A Systematic Review,” Patient, 12, no. 5, pp. 461–474, (Oct. 2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. S. L. Vargo, R. F. Lusch, and M. A. Akaka, “Advancing Service Science with Service-Dominant Logic: Clarifications and Conceptual Development,” in Handbook of Service Science, P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, and J. C. Spohrer, Eds. Boston, MA: Springer US, (2010), pp. 133–156. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. L. Vargo and R. F. Lusch, “Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic,” J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci., 44, no. 1, pp. 5–23, (Jan. 2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. L. Vargo, M. A. Akaka, C. M. Vaughan,. “Conceptualizing Value: A Service-ecosystem View” (2017) [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Frow, J. R. McColl-Kennedy, and A. Payne, “Co-creation practices: Their role in shaping a health care ecosystem,” Industrial Marketing Management, 56, pp. 24–39, (Jul. 2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Capunzo, F. Polese, G. Boccia, L. Carrubbo, F. Clarizia, and F. De Caro, “Advances in Service Research for the understanding and the management of service in healthcare networks,” The 2013 Naples Forum on Service, System Theory and Service Science: Integrating three perspectives in a new service agenda, (Jun. 2013). [Google Scholar]
  27. L. Carrubbo, F. Clarizia, X. Hisa, A. Bilotta, New Smarter solutions for the Healthcare Complex Service System. In System Theory and Service Science: Integrating Three Perspectives in a New Service Agenda; Gummesson, E., Mele, C., Polese, F., Eds.; Giannini: Naples, Italy, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. J. L. Bumble, E. W. Carter, E. McMillan, A. S. Manikas, and L. K. Bethune, “Community Conversations on Integrated Employment: Examining Individualization, Influential Factors, and Impact,” Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28, no. 4, pp. 229–243, (Mar. 2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. L. L. Anderson, K. Humphries, S. McDermott, B. Marks, J. Sisirak & S. Larson, The state of the science of health and wellness for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 51(5),385-398. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. D. A. Ervin, B. Hennen, J. Merrick, & M. Morad, Healthcare for persons with intellectual and developmental disability in the community. Frontiers in public health, 2, 83. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  31. K. Fiscella, “Confronting the Post-ACA American Health Crisis: Designing Health Care for Value and Equity,” J Ambul Care Manage, 42, no. 3, pp. 202–210, (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. L. Xu, N. L.Fields, J. A. Greer, P. M. Tamplain, J.C. Bricout, B. Sharma, & K. L. Doelling, Socially assistive robotics and older family caregivers of young adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD): A pilot study exploring respite, acceptance, and usefulness. Plos one, 17(9), e0273479. (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. N. G. Badr, & M. Dankar, Assistive Healthcare Robotics–Challenges in Nursing Service Innovation: Critical Review. In ITM Web of Conferences (41, p. 02002). EDP Sciences. (2022) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. S. Rosenbaum, K. Edwards, G.C. Ramírez & J. Grady, Transformative service research: thoughts, perspectives, and research directions. The Routledge Handbook of Service Research Insights and Ideas, 424-442. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  35. A. J. Knighton, Is a patient’s current address of record a reasonable measure of neighborhood deprivation exposure? A case for the use of point in time measures of residence in clinical care. Health Equity, 2(1),62-69. (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Appelgren, C. Bahtsevani, K. Persson, G. Borglin, Nurses’ experiences of caring for patients with intellectual developmental disorders: a systematic review using a meta-ethnographic approach. BMC Nurs. (2018 Dec) 3;17: 51. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ä.-D. Latteck and D. Bruland, “Inclusion of People with Intellectual Disabilities in Health Literacy: Lessons Learned from Three Participative Projects for Future Initiatives,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17, no. 7, p. 2455, (Apr. 2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. A. J. Doherty et al., “Barriers and facilitators to primary health care for people with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: an integrative review,” BJGP Open, 4, no. 3, p. bjgpopen20X101030, (Aug. 2020). [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Ali, K. Scior, V. Ratti, A. Strydom, M.King, & A. Hassiotis, Discrimination and other barriers to accessing health care: perspectives of patients with mild and moderate intellectual disability and their carers. PloS one, 8(8), e70855. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Brown et al., “The perspectives of stakeholders of intellectual disability liaison nurses: a model of compassionate, person-centred care,” J Clin Nurs, 25, no. 7–8, pp. 972–982, (Apr. 2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. D. Wiljer et al., “Accelerating the Appropriate Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Protocol for a Multistepped Approach,” JMIR Res Protoc, 10, no. 10, p. e30940, (Oct. 2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. C. C. Zwack, R. McDonald, A. Tursunalieva, G. W. Lambert, and E. A. Lambert, “Exploration of diet, physical activity, health knowledge and the cardio metabolic profile of young adults with intellectual disability,” J Intellect Disabil Res, 66, no. 6, pp. 517–532, (Jun. 2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. W. R. Smith, A. J. Atala, R. P. Terlecki, E. E. Kelly, and C. A. Matthews, “Implementation Guide for Rapid Integration of an Outpatient Telemedicine Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 231, no. 2, pp. 216-222e2, (Aug. 2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. E. Monaghesh and A. Hajizadeh, “The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence,” BMC Public Health, 20, no. 1, p. 1193, (Dec. 2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. N. Badr, L. Mohtar, Telehealth: A Viable Option for Optimizing Health System Performance during COVID-19: Call to Action for Future Pandemics. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 5: HEALTHINF, ISBN 978-989-758-552-4, ISSN 2184-4305, pages 279-288.,” (Feb. 2022). [Google Scholar]
  46. Y. Zhai, “A Call for Addressing Barriers to Telemedicine: Health Disparities during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Psychother Psychosom, 90, no. 1, pp. 64–66, (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. L. F. Tan, V. Ho Wen Teng, S. K. Seetharaman, and A. W. Yip, “Facilitating telehealth for older adults during the COVID ‐19 pandemic and beyond: Strategies from a Singapore geriatric center,” Geriatr. Gerontol. Int., 20, no. 10, pp. 993–995, (Oct. 2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. R. P. Fisk et al., “Design for service inclusion: creating inclusive service systems by 2050,” Journal of Service Management, 29, no. 5, pp. 834–858, (Jan. 2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. X. Gong, H. Wang, X. Zhang, and H. Tian, “Why does service inclusion matter? The effect of service exclusion on customer indirect misbehavior,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, no. C, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  50. E. M. Kuntz, E. W. Carter, K. Cassady, and V. F. Knight, “Observing Inclusion in STEM Classes: Academic and Social Participation of Students With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,” Inclusion, 10, no. 1, pp. 1–18, (Feb. 2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. S. Hamideh Kerdar, B. M. Kirchhoff, L. Bächler, and L. Adolph, “Scoping Review Protocol of Technological Interventions for Vocational Inclusion of Individuals with Disabilities,” Disabilities, 2, no. 3, Art. no. 3, (Sep. 2022). [Google Scholar]
  52. M. Bogenschutz, P. Dinora, S. Lineberry, S. Prohn, M. Broda, and A. West, “Promising Practices in the Frontiers of Quality Outcome Measurement for Intellectual and Developmental Disability Services,” Front Rehabil Sci, 3, p. 871178, (Apr. 2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. S. Nundy, L. A. Cooper, and K. S. Mate, “The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity,” JAMA, 327, no. 6, p. 521, (Feb. 2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. M. Milne-Ives et al., “Humanizing Health and Social Care Support for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Protocol for a Scoping Review,” JMIR Research Protocols, 11, no. 5, p. e31720, (May 2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.