Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 55, 2023
First Workshop affiliated to the annual International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS Workshop 2.3)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 12
Section IESS Workshop Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20235502001
Published online 27 July 2023
  1. “Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data,” United States Environmental Protection Agency, Feb. 15, 2023. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data (accessed Jun. 12, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  2. “Promoting climate resilient industry.” https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2015-12/01._UNIDO_Promoting_Climate_Resilient_Industry_0.pdf (accessed Jun. 12, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  3. W. R. Stahel, “The circular economy,” Nature, no. 7595, pp. 435–438, Mar. 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Geng, J. Sarkis, and R. Bleischwitz, “How to globalize the circular economy,” Nature, no. 7738, pp. 153–155, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00017-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. R. A. D’Aveni, G. B. Dagnino, and K. G. Smith, “The age of temporary advantage,” Strategic Management Journal, no. 13, pp. 1371–1385, Oct. 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Zhang, J. Wang, and J. You, “Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products,” European Journal of Operational Research, no. 1, pp. 63–73, Feb. 2015 [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Calabrese, M. Dora, N. Levialdi Ghiron, and L. Tiburzi, “Industry’s 4.0 transformation process: how to start, where to aim, what to be aware of,” Production Planning & Control, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  8. “Sustainable Manufacturing: from Vision to Action,” 2021. https://www.deloitte.com/content/dam/assets-shared/legacy/docs/industry/energy-resources-industrials/2022/gx-eri-sustainable-manufacturing-2021.pdf (accessed Jun. 1, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  9. M.-L. Tseng, R. R. Tan, A. S. F. Chiu, C.-F. Chien, and T. C. Kuo, “Circular economy meets industry 4.0: Can big data drive industrial symbiosis?” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, pp. 146–147, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.12.028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. UNEP (2011) Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Fischer-Kowalski, M., Swilling, M., von Weizsäcker, E.U., Ren, Y., Moriguchi, Y., Crane, W., Krausmann, F., Eisenmenger, N., Giljum, S., Hennicke, P., Romero Lankao, P., Siriban Manalang, A., Sewerin, S. [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Schiavone, D. Leone, A. Caporuscio, and S. Lan, “Digital servitization and new sustainable configurations of manufacturing systems,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, p. 121441, Mar. 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Handoyo, H. Suharman, E. K. Ghani, and S. Soedarsono, “A business strategy, operational efficiency, ownership structure, and manufacturing performance: The moderating role of market uncertainty and competition intensity and its implication on open innovation,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, no. 2, p. 100039, Jun. 2023 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Kotler, G. Armstrong, V. Wong, and J. Saunders, Principles of Marketing, 4th ed. Pearson Education, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Hatvany, “An Efficient Use of Deficient Knowledge,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, no. 20, pp. 25–29, Oct. 1983 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Monostori et al., “Towards adaptive and digital manufacturing,” Annual Reviews in Control, no. 1, pp. 118–128, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2010.02.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. M. Christensen, M. E. Raynor, and R. McDonald, “What is disruptive innovation?,” Harvard Business Review, no. 93, pp. 44–53, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  17. K. Kilkki, M. Mäntylä, K. Karhu, H. Hämmäinen, and H. Ailisto, “A disruption framework,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp. 275–284, Apr. 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Sarkis, “Manufacturing’s role in corporate environmental sustainability ‐ Concerns for the new millennium,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, no. 5/6, pp. 666–686, May 2001, doi: 10.1108/01443570110390390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Ellström, E. Sandin, and A. Reeb, “Is your digital strategy fit for the manufacturing future? | EY Global,” Ernest & Young -Building a better working world, Mar. 06, 2023. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/advanced-manufacturing/is-your-digital-strategy-fit-for-the-manufacturing-future (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Knizek, J. Gootee, and G. Sarafin, “Industrial companies lead business model innovation | EY Global,” EY Building a better working world, Jun. 30, 2022. https://www.ey.com/en_gl/advanced-manufacturing/why-industrial-companies-need-to-lead-business-model-innovation (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Vandermerwe and J. Rada, “Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services,” European Management Journal, no. 4, pp. 314–324, Dec. 1988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T. S. Baines et al., “State-of-the-Art in Product-Service Systems,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, no. 221 (10), pp. 1543–1552, 2007, Accessed: Jun. 13, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Ren, and G. M.J., “Servitization in manufacturing companies: A conceptualization, critical review, and research agenda,” Frontiers in Service Conference, Oct. 2007, Accessed: Jun. 13, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Ulaga and W. J. Reinartz, “Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully,” Journal of Marketing, no. 6, pp. 5–23, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1509/jm.09.0395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. O. F. Bustinza, A. Z. Bigdeli, T. Baines, and C. Elliot, “Servitization and Competitive Advantage: The Importance of Organizational Structure and Value Chain Position,” Research-Technology Management, no. 5, pp. 53–60, Sep. 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Rothenberg, “Sustainability through servicizing,” MIT Sloan Management Review, no. 48(2), pp. 83–89, Dec. 2007, Accessed: Jun. 13, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  27. T. Paschou, M. Rapaccini, F. Adrodegari, and N. Saccani, “Digital servitization in manufacturing: A systematic literature review and research agenda,” Industrial Marketing Management, pp. 278–292, Aug. 2020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Bressanelli, F. Adrodegari, M. Perona, and N. Saccani, “Exploring How UsageFocused Business Models Enable Circular Economy through Digital Technologies,” Sustainability, no. 3, p. 639, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10030639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. P. M. Madhani, “The Resource Based View (RBV): Issues and Perspectives,” PACE, A Journal of Research of Prestige Institute of Management, no. 1, pp. 43–55, Jan. 2010 [Google Scholar]
  30. S. L. Vargo, H. Wieland, and M. O’Brien, “Service-dominant logic as a unifying theoretical framework for the re-institutionalization of the marketing discipline,” Journal of Business Research, p. 113965, Sep. 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. O. K. Mont, “Clarifying the concept of product–service system,” Journal of Clean Production, no. 10, pp. 237–245, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Tukker, “Eight types of product-service system: Eight ways to sustainability? experiences from suspronet.,” Business Strategy and the Environment, no. 13(4), pp. 246–260, 2004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Alvarez-Risco, M. A. Rosen, and S. Del-Aguila-Arcentales, Towards a Circular Economy. Springer Nature, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  34. E. T. Straub, “Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning,” Review of Educational Research, no. 2, pp. 625–649, Jun. 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. “TotalCare® | Rolls-Royce,” Rolls-Royce plc 2023. https://www.rollsroyce.com/media/our-stories/discover/2017/totalcare.aspx (accessed Jun. 07, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  36. “FarmSight Services | John Deere,” John Deere UK & IE. https://www.deere.co.uk/en/parts-and-service/services/farmsight/ (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  37. “Philips Lighting is now Signify | Signify Company Website,” Signify. https://www.signify.com/global/our-company/news/press-releases/2018/20180516-philips-lighting-is-now-signify (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  38. “Schindler Ahead Smart Urban Mobility | Schindler Group,” Welcome to the Schindler Group. https://group.schindler.com/en/company/innovations/schindlerahead.html [Google Scholar]
  39. “EcoStruxure Platform | Schneider Electric Global,” Schneider Electric Global | Global Specialist in Energy Management and Automation. https://www.se.com/ww/en/work/campaign/innovation/platform.jsp [Google Scholar]
  40. “GE Digital | Accelerate Decarbonization with Software,” GE | Building a world that works | General Electric. https://www.ge.com/digital/ [Google Scholar]
  41. “Service Economy: The Third Industrial Revolution Will Turn Customers into Designers | GE News,” GE | Building a world that works | General Electric. https://www.ge.com/news/reports/service-economy (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  42. “Managed Equipment Services (MTS) | Philips,” Philips. https://www.philips.co.uk/healthcare/medical-products/partnerships/managed-services (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  43. “Caterpillar pay for useTM and how it can help,” CAT | https://www.cat.com/en_US/articles/financing/what-is-caterpillar-pay-for-use-and-how-does-it-help-your-business.html (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  44. “MICHELIN® FLEET SOLUTIONSTM,” | MICHELIN COMMERCIAL TIRES. https://business.michelinman.com/freight-transportation/freight-transportationservices/michelin-fleet-solutions (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]
  45. “Access by BMW,” AccessbyBMW.com.sg/. https://accessbybmw.com.sg/#/subscriptions/home (accessed Jun. 13, 2023). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.