Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 62, 2024
International Conference on Exploring Service Science (IESS 2.4)
Article Number 05001
Number of page(s) 15
Section Value-Driven & Data-Driven Smart Applications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20246205001
Published online 01 February 2024
  1. M. Hermann, T. Pentek, B. Otto, Design Principles for Industrie 4.0 Scenarios, in 2016 49th HICSS (2016), pp. 3928–3937 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Steffen, S. Boßelmann, GOLD: Global Organization aLignment and Decision - Towards the Hierarchical Integration of Heterogeneous Business Models, in Leverag- ing Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (Springer, 2018), 11247 of LNCS, pp. 504–527, ISBN 9783030034276 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Möller, H. Bauhaus, C. Hoffmann, C. Niess, B. Otto, Archetypes of Digital Business Models in Logistics Start-Ups, in Proceedings of the 27th ECIS (2019) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Rotgang, E. Duparc, B. Steffen, S. Hoevel, J. Mayer, W. Stodolka, Federal Platform Ecosystems to Counter Monopolists: A Value-Based Vision for the Logistics Industry, in Proceedings of the 56th HICSS (2023) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Weking, M. Stöcker, M. Kowalkiewicz, M. Böhm, H. Krcmar, Archetypes for Industry 4.0 Business Model Innovations, in Proceedings of the 24th AMCIS (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Cichosz, C. Wallenburg, A. Knemeyer, Digital transformation at logistics service providers: barriers, success factors and leading practices, 31, pp. 209–238 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.C. Schmidt, J. Veile, J. Müller, K.I. Voigt, Kick-start for connectivity: how to implement digital platforms successfully in Industry 4.0 (Talent First Network), 9, pp. 5–15, ISSN 1927-0321 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Wallsten, The competitive effects of the sharing economy how is Uber changing taxis, 22 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Kenney, J. Zysman, The rise of the platform economy, 32, p. 61 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Bilgeri, F. Wortmann, E. Fleisch, How digital transformation affects large manufacturing companies’ organization, in Proceedings of the 38th ICIS, pp. 1–9 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Sandberg, Logistics collaboration in supply chains: practice vs. theory, 18, pp. 274–293 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Steffen, F. Möller, L. Nowak, Transformer(s) of the Logistics Industry - Enabling Logistics Companies to Excel with Digital Platforms, in Proceedings of the 55th HICSS (2022) [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Hermes, E. Clemons, M. Schreieck, S. Pfab, M. Mitre, M. Böhm, M. Wiesche, H. Krcmar, Breeding Grounds of Digital Platforms: Exploring the Sources of American Platform Domination, China’s Platform Self-Sufficiency, and Europe’s Platform Gap, in Proceedings of the 28th ECIS (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Commission, J.R. Centre, K. Blind, N. Thumm, M. Böhm, The relationship between open source software and standard setting (Publications Office of the European Union), ISBN 9789276115939, https://op.europa.eu/s/nFEQ (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Margan, S. Candrlic, The success of open-source software: A review (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. AlMarzouq, L. Zheng, G. Rong, V. Grover, Open Source: Concepts, Benefits, and Challenges, 16, pp. 505–521 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Asadullah, I. Faik, A. Kankanhalli, Digital Platforms: A Review and Future Directions, in Proceedings of the 22nd PACIS (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. Merriam-Webster, Standard&meaning - Merriam Webster, online, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/standard (2023) [Google Scholar]
  19. SJonesContainers, A history of iso containers, online, https://www.sjonescontainers.co.uk/containerpedia/a-history-of-iso-containers (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Organization, Jdf specification, online, https://www.cip4.org/files/cip4-2022/Documents/Specifications/JDF%20Specification%201.7.pdf (2020) [Google Scholar]
  21. W. Kühn, M. Grell, JDF: Prozessintegration, Technologie, Produktdarstellung, ISBN 9783540208938 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Gourley, B. Totty, HTTP: The Definitive Guide (O’Reilly Media, Incorporated), ISBN 9781565925090 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Berners-Lee, The original http as defined in 1991, online, https://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/AsImplemented (1991) [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Dahlander, D. Gann, How open is innovation?, 39, pp. 699–709 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Tavakoli, D. Schlagwein, D. Schoder, Open strategy: Literature review, re-analysis of cases and conceptualisation as a practice, 26, pp. 163–184 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Schlagwein, K. Conboy, J. Feller, J. Leimeister, L. Morgan, “Openness” with and without Information Technology: A Framework and a Brief History, 32, pp. 297–305 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. J. West, Open source platforms beyond software: From ict to biotechnology (2017) [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Krogh, S. Spaeth, K. Lakhani, Community, joining, and specialization in open- source software innovation: a case study, 32, pp. 1217–1241 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  29. H. Chesbrough, M. Bogers, Explicating open innovation (2014) [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Curcuru, The apache way, community over code, online, https://theapacheway.com/community-over-code/ (2018) [Google Scholar]
  31. O. Alexy, J. Henkel, M. Wallin, From closed to open: Job role changes, individual predispositions, and the adoption of commercial open-source software development, 42, pp. 1325–1340 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  32. H. Avdiji, D. Elikan, S. Missonier, Y. Pigneur, A design theory for visual inquiry tools, 21, p. 3 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Hevner, A three cycle view of design science research, 19, p. 4 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Thoring, R. Mueller, P. Badke-Schaub, Workshops as a research method: Guidelines for designing and evaluating artifacts through workshops (2020) [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Webster, R. Watson, Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review (MISRC, University of Minnesota) (2002) [Google Scholar]
  36. OLF, Open logistics foundation, online, https://openlogisticsfoundation.org (2024) [Google Scholar]
  37. T. Eisenmann, Managing Proprietary and Shared Platforms, 50, pp. 31–53 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  38. T. Saebi, N. Foss, Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions, 33, pp. 201–213 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  39. T. Tegeler, S. Boßelmann, J. Schürmann, S. Smyth, S. Teumert, B. Steffen, Executable Documentation: From Documentation Languages to Purpose-Specific Languages, in Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (Springer), 13702 of LNCS, pp. 174–192, ISBN 9783031197550 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  40. B. Steffen, S. Boßelmann, Domain-Specificity as Enabler for Global Organization aLignment and Decision, in Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (Springer), 13704 of LNCS, pp. 340–365 (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Teumert, T. Tegeler, J. Schürmann, D. Busch, D. Wirkner, Evaluation of Graphical Modeling of CI/CD Workflows with Rig, in Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (Springer), 13702 of LNCS, pp. 374–388, ISBN 9783031197550 (2022) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.