Open Access
| Issue |
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 63, 2024
1st International Conference on Advances in Machine Intelligence, and Cybersecurity Technologies (AMICT2023)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01024 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20246301024 | |
| Published online | 13 February 2024 | |
- D. A. Alboaneen et al., “Internet of Things Based Smart Mirrors: A Literature Review,” in 2020 3rd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS), Mar. 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICCAIS48893.2020.9096719. [Google Scholar]
- A. S. Sneha, J. Sonica, M. Pavithra, S. Luqman, and S. Rohith, “Multi-Function Digital Mirror Using Raspberry Pi with IOT,” in ICDSMLA 2020, A. Kumar, S. Senatore, and V. K. Gunjan, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Singapore: Springer, 2022, pp. 1171–1179. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-3690-5_112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Alboaneen et al., “Smart information desk system with voice assistant for universities,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. IJECE, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. 6, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- K. Kous, M. Pušnik, M. Heričko, and G. Polančič, “Usability evaluation of a library website with different end user groups,” J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 75–90, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1177/0961000618773133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. P. Bakara, T. Raharjo, B. Hardian, and A. Suhanto, “Project Quality Management Challenges and Solutions in IT Project: A Systematic Literature Review,” in 2021 IEEE 7th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED), Aug. 2021, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICCED53389.2021.9664861. [Google Scholar]
- O. E. Olorunshola and F. N. Ogwueleka, “Review of System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models for Effective Application Delivery,” in Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies (ICTCS 2020), A. Joshi, M. Mahmud, R. G. Ragel, and N. V. Thakur, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Singapore: Springer, 2022, pp. 281–289. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-0739-4_28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Bayomi, N. A.Sayed, H. Hassan, and K. Wassif, “Application-based Usability Evaluation Metrics,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. IJACSA, vol. 13, no. 7, Art. no. 7, 31 2022, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130712. [Google Scholar]
- S. C. Peres, T. Pham, and R. Phillips, “Validation of the System Usability Scale (SUS): SUS in the Wild,” Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet., vol. 57, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1541931213571043. [Google Scholar]
- J. R. Lewis, “The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future,” Int. J. Human–Computer Interact., vol. 34, no. 7, Art. no. 7, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307. [Google Scholar]
- J. R. Lewis and J. Sauro, “Item Benchmarks for the System,” vol. 13, no. 3, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- M. Schmidt et al., “User Experience (re)Design and Evaluation of a Self-Guided, Mobile Health App for Adolescents with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury,” J. Form. Des. Learn., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 51–64, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s41686-019-00038-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.