EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 76 (2025) ITM Web Conf., 76 (2025) 03002 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2025
Harnessing Innovation for Sustainability in Computing and Engineering Solutions (ICSICE-2025)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 9
Section IoT & Edge Computing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20257603002
Published online 25 March 2025
  1. Kandris, D., & Anastasiadis, E. (2024). Advanced wireless sensor networks: Applications, challenges and research trends. Electronics, 13(12), 2268. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13122268 [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, S., Wang, H., Xu, T., & Zhou, G. (2021). Informatics in control, automation and robotics. In Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (pp. 1–10). Springer. [Google Scholar]
  3. Apte, J. S., Messier, K. P., Gani, S., Brauer, M., & Kirchstetter, T. W. (2017). High-resolution air pollution mapping with Google Street View cars: Exploiting big data. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(12), 6999–7008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Feinberg, S., Williams, R., Hagler, G. S. W., Rickard, J., & Garver, D. (2018). Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 11(8), 4605–4615. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hart, J. K., & Martinez, K. (2015). Toward an environmental Internet of Things. Earth and Space Science, 2(5), 194–200. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Raza, S., Misra, P., He, Z., & Voigt, T. (2017). Building the Internet of Things with Bluetooth Smart. Ad Hoc Networks, 57, 19–31. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stergiou, C., Psannis, K., Kim, B. G., & Gupta, B. (2016). Secure integration of IoT and cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 964–975. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavalcante, E., Pereira, J., Alves, M. P., Maia, P., & Moura, R. (2016). On the interplay of Internet of Things and cloud computing: A systematic mapping study. Computer Communications, 89-90, 17–33. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Zhu, J., & Addepalli, S. (2012). Fog computing and its role in the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the first edition of the MCC workshop on Mobile cloud computing (pp. 13–16). ACM. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lopez, P. G., Datta, A., Barcellos, M., Montresor, A., & Higashino, T. (2015). Edge-centric computing: Vision and challenges. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 45(5), 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  12. Karp, B., & Kung, H. T. (2000). GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp. 243–254). ACM. [Google Scholar]
  13. Velmani, R., & Kaarthick, B. (2015). An efficient cluster-tree based data collection scheme for large mobile wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15(4), 2377–2390. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yan, H., Huo, H., Xu, Y., & Gidlund, M. (2010). Wireless sensor network based E-health system-Implementation and experimental results. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 56(4), 2288–2295. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ehsan, S., Hamdaoui, B., Guizani, M., & Rayes, A. (2012). Design and analysis of delay-tolerant sensor networks for monitoring and tracking free-roaming animals. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11(3), 1220–1227. [Google Scholar]
  16. White, B., Dougherty, E., Peurrung, A., Abbott, A. L., & Berman, S. (2008). Contaminant cloud boundary monitoring using network of UAV sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal, 8(10), 1681–1692. [Google Scholar]
  17. Akyildiz, I. F., Pompili, D., & Melodia, T. (2005). Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 3(3), 257–279. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pompili, D., & Melodia, T. (2005). Three-dimensional routing in underwater acoustic sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, and ubiquitous networks (pp. 214–221). ACM. [Google Scholar]
  19. Domingo, M. C. (2008). Overview of channel models for underwater wireless communication networks. Physical Communication, 1(3), 163–182. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tomasi, B., Toni, L., Casari, P., Rossi, L., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Performance study of variable-rate modulation for underwater communications based on experimental data. In OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE (pp. 1–8). IEEE. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.