Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 12, 2017
The 4th Annual International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ITA 2017)
Article Number 04004
Number of page(s) 5
Section Session 4: Information Theory and Information Systems
Published online 05 September 2017
  1. R Socher., Chen, D., Manning, C.D., Ng, Y.: Reasoning With Neural Tensor Networks for Knowledge Base Completion. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 2013 [Google Scholar]
  2. Guoliang Ji, Yinghua Zhang, Hongwei Hao, and Jun Zhao: Reasoning Over Relations Based on Chinese Knowledge Bases. Springer International Publishing,2014,8801:141–150 [Google Scholar]
  3. F. M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. G.A. Miller. WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Communications of the ACM, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mukherjee, T., Pande, V., Kok, S.: Extracting New Facts in Knowledge Bases:-A matrix trifactorization approach. In: ICML Workshop on Structured Learning:Inferring Graphs from Structured and Unstructured Inputs, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  6. Nickel, M., Tresp, V., Chen, Kriegel H.P.: A Three-Way Model for Collective Learning on Multi-Relational Data. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning 2011 [Google Scholar]
  7. Huang, E.H., Socher, R., Manning, C.D., Ng, Y.: Improving Word Representations via Global Context and Multiple Word Prototypes. In: Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL, 2012 [Google Scholar]
  8. Tomas Mikolov,Ilya Sutskever,Kai Chen,Greg Corrado,Jeffrey Dean. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality. arXiv:1310.4546 2013 [Google Scholar]
  9. Y Goldberg, O Levy. Word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.’s negative-sampling word-embedding method. Eprint Arxi,2014 [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Socher, B. Huval, C. D. Manning, and A. Y. Ng. Semantic Compositionality Through Recursive Matrix-Vector Spaces. In EMNLP, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Danqi Chen, Richard Socher, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Y. Ng. Learning New Facts From Knowledge Bases With Neural Tensor Networks and Semantic Word Vectors ICLR 2013 [Google Scholar]
  12. A Bordes, J Weston, R Collobert, Y Bengio. Learning Structured Embeddings of Knowledge Bases. Aaai Conference on Artificial Intelligence,2011 [Google Scholar]
  13. Xu Zenglin, Sheng Yongpan, He Lirong, Wang Yafang Knowledge Atlas Technology Journal of Electronic Science and Technology University, Vol. 45, 2016.7 page: 46–52 [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Collobert and J. Weston. A unified architecture for natural language processing: deep neural networks with multitask learning. In ICML, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li Xiangyang, Miao Zhuang. Free text information extraction technology [J]. Information Science, 2004, 22 (7): 815–821 [Google Scholar]
  16. LIU Qiao, LI Yang, DUAN Hong, LIU Yao, QIN Zhi-guang Overview of Knowledge Map Construction Technology University of Electronic Science and Technology Information and Software Engineering Institute of Computer Research and Development 2016 page: 582–600 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lao N, Subramanya A, Pereira F, et al. Reading the web with learned syntactic-semantic inference rules[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. Association for Computational Linguistics,–1026. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Bollacker, C. Evans, P. Paritosh, T. Sturge, and J. Taylor. Freebase: a collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, SIGMOD, 2008 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.