Open Access
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 32, 2020
International Conference on Automation, Computing and Communication 2020 (ICACC-2020)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 5
Section Communication
Published online 29 July 2020
  1. Islam, Md Kafiul, Amir Rastegarnia, and Zhi Yang. “A wavelet-based artifact reduction from scalp EEG for epileptic seizure detection.” IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 20.5 (2016): 1321-1321. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fisher, Robert S., et al. “The impact of epilepsy from the patients perspective I. Descriptions and subjective perceptions.” Epilepsy research 41.1 (2000): 39-39. [Google Scholar]
  3. O Regan, Simon, Stephen Faul, and William Marnane. “Automatic detection of EEG artefacts arising from head movements using EEG and gyroscope signals.” Medical engineering physics 35.7 (2013): 867-867. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gwin, Joseph Toliver, et al. “Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running.” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. Saab, M.E., and Jean Gotman. “A system to detect the onset of epileptic seizures in scalp EEG.” Clinical Neurophysiology 116.2 (2005): 427-427. [Google Scholar]
  6. Teplan, Michal. “Fundamentals of EEG measurement.” Measurement science review 2.2 (2002): 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowman, James, F. Edward Dudek, and Mark Spitz. “Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent epileptic seizures. Brain injury and genetic abnormalities underlie this disorder.” [Google Scholar]
  8. Islam, Md Kafiul, et al. “Artifact characterization and removal for in vivo neural recording.” Journal of neuroscience methods 226 (2014): 110-123. [Google Scholar]
  9. Coifman, Ronald R., and David L. Donoho. “Translation-invariant de-noising.” Wavelets and statistics. Springer, New York, NY, 1995. 125-150. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao, Hong-Ye. “Wavelet shrinkage denoising using the non-negative garrote.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7.4 (1998): 469-488. [Google Scholar]
  11. Flexer, Arthur, et al. “Using ICA for removal of ocular artifacts in EEG recorded from blind subjects.” Neural Networks 18.7 (2005): 998-1005. [Google Scholar]
  12. Joyce, Carrie A., Irina F. Gorodnitsky, and Marta Kutas. “Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation.” Psychophysiology 41.2 (2004): 313-325. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hallez, Hans, et al. “Removing muscle and eye artifacts using blind source separation techniques in ictal EEG source imaging.” Clinical Neurophysiology 120.7 (2009): 1262-1272. [Google Scholar]
  14. Esteller, Rosana, et al. “Line length: an efficient feature for seizure onset detection.” 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol. 2. IEEE, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rafiuddin, Nidal, Yusuf Uzzaman Khan, and Omar Farooq. “Feature extraction and classification of EEG for automatic seizure detection.” 2011 International Conference on Multimedia, Signal Processing and Communication Technologies. IEEE, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  16. Song, Yuedong, Jon Crowcroft, and Jiaxiang Zhang. “Automatic epileptic seizure detection in EEGs based on optimized sample entropy and extreme learning machine.” Journal of neuroscience methods 210.2 (2012): 132-146. [Google Scholar]
  17. Misiti, M., et al. “Wavelet toolbox for use with Matlab, Users Guide, Ver. 3., The MathWorks.” Inc. Users Guide (2004). [Google Scholar]
  18. (2014, Nov. 21). [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  19. Kutlu, Yakup, and Damla Kuntalp. “Feature extraction for ECG heartbeats using higher order statistics of WPD coefficients.” Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 105.3 (2012): 257-267. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.