Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 35, 2020
International Forum “IT-Technologies for Engineering Education: New Trends and Implementing Experience” (ITEE-2019)
Article Number 01020
Number of page(s) 11
Section Engineering Education Technology Based on Using Digital Resources
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20203501020
Published online 09 December 2020
  1. O.S. Erkovich, S.P. Erkovich, A.A. Esakov, I.S. Golyak, Formirovanie matricy kompetencij kak sredstvo proektirovaniya programmy uchebnoj discipliny [Formation of the Competence Matrix as a Means of Designing the Curriculum of an Academic Discipline], Fizi-cheskoe obrazovanie v vuzah [Physical Education in Universities] 18(3), pp. 27-31 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  2. O.S. Erkovich, N.A. Zadorozhnyj, A.N. Morozov, M.L. Pozdyshev, S.L. Timchenko, «Russkij metod obucheniya» na kafedre fiziki pri podgotovke inzhenerov [“Russian Training Method” at the Physics Department for Training Engineers], Fizicheskoe obrazovanie v VUZah [Physical Education in Universities] 22(4), pp.5-19 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. T.Yu. Tsibizova, V.M. Postnikov, S.B. Spiridonov, Analiz vliyaniya tekhnologij lekcij-vizualizacij na rezul’taty kontrol’nyh meropriyatij po uchebnym disciplinam [Analysis of the Impact of Lecture-Visualization Technologies on the Results of Control Measures in Academic Disciplines], Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya [Prospects for Science and Education] 3(33), pp. 358-363 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. T.N. Noskova, T.B. Pavlova, O.V. Yakovleva, Nekotorye effekty informatizacii obrazovatel’noj sredy sovremennogo vuza [Some Effects of Informatization of the Educational Environment of a Modern University], Otkrytoe obrazovanie [Open Education] 20(3), pp. 24-30 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  5. T.V. Nikulina, E.B. Starichenko, Informatizaciya i cifrovizaciya obrazovaniya: ponyatiya, tekhnologii, upravlenie [Informatization and Digitalization of Education: Concepts, Technologies, Management], Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical Education in Russia] 8, pp. 107-113 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. V.Y. Shurygin, L.A. Krasnova, Electronic Learning Courses as a Means to Activate Students’ Independent Work in Studying Physics, International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11(8), pp. 1743-1751 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Eitel, How repeated studying and testing affects multimedia learning: Evidence for adaptation to task demands, Learning and Instruction 41, 70-84 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N.A. Crowder, Automatic training by intrinsic programming, Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning, ed. A.A. Lumsdaine, R. Glaser Teaching Machines, Washington (1961) [Google Scholar]
  9. B.F. Skinner, The technology of teaching, BF Skinner Foundation (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Delbanco, College: What It Was, Is, and Should Be-Updated Edition, Vol. 82, Princeton University Press (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Elby, Helping physics students learn how to learn, American Journal of Physics 69(S1), pp. 54-64 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.G. Sergeeva, I.S. Samokhin, M.S. Mohammad Anwar, N.N. Bedenko, N.Z. Karavanova, T.Yu. Tsibizova, «Educational company» (Technology): Peculiarities of its implementation in the system of professional education, Espacios, 39(2), p. 24 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. T.Yu. Tsibizova, N.G. Poyarkov, S.V. Mamaeva, A.V. Rubtsov, E.M. Plekhanova, V. V. Kolchina, I. N. Tonkavich, Forming a pedagogue’s research competences in innovative educational environment, International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(4.38), p. 1243-1246 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P.J. Feltovich, R.J. Spiro, R.L. Coulson, Learning Teaching, and Testing for Complex Conceptual Understanding, Test theory for a new generation of tests, pp. 193-230, Routledge (2012) [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Ding, N. W. Reay, A. Lee, L. Bao, Effects of testing conditions on conceptual survey results, Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 4(1), 010112 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. O.Yu. Dement’eva, S.L. Timchenko, N.A. Zadorozhnyj, Sposoby izmereniya shiriny linii rezonansnogo pogloshcheniya v usloviyah EPR [Methods for Measuring the Width of the Resonant Absorption Line in EPR Conditions], Fizicheskoe obrazovanie v vuzah [Physical Education in Universities], 22(4), pp. 77-87 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  17. S.L. Timchenko, N.A. Zadorozhnyj, O.Yu. Dement’eva, Izuchenie razdelov atomnoj fiziki v laboratornom praktikume tekhnicheskogo universiteta [Study of Sections of Atomic Physics in the Laboratory Workshop of the Technical University], Fizicheskoe obrazovanie v vuzah [Physical Education in Universities], 24(2), pp. 98111 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Kim, J. Choi, J. Song, Developing a web-based system for testing students’ physics misconceptions (WEBSYSTEM) and its implementation, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 27(2), pp. 105-119 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  19. T.F. Muqarrobin, H. Kuswanto, Development of an android-based physics e-book to ease students’ physics learning And its influence on their learning achievement, American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 5(10) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Hill, M.D. Sharma, H. Johnston, How online learning modules can improve the representational fluency and conceptual understanding of university physics students, European Journal of Physics, 36(4), 045019 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. D.S. Goodman, F.J. Rueckert, J. O’Brien, Initial steps toward a study on the effectiveness of multimedia learning modules in introductory physics courses for engineers, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. R.A. Serway, J.W. Jewett, Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics, Cengage learning (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.