EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 35 (2020) ITM Web Conf., 35 (2020) 05002 References
Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 35, 2020
International Forum “IT-Technologies for Engineering Education: New Trends and Implementing Experience” (ITEE-2019)
Article Number 05002
Number of page(s) 11
Section Digital Inclusive Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20203505002
Published online 09 December 2020
  1. Study of the Russian market of online education and educational technologies, https://edumarket.digital/, last accessed 2019/9/12. [Google Scholar]
  2. I.E. Allen, J. Seaman, Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States, Sloan Consortium, PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. Coursera platform, https://about.coursera.org/, last accessed 2020/1/25. [Google Scholar]
  4. National platform of open education, http://npoed.ru/about, last accessed 2020/1/25. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stepik platform, https://stepik.org/catalog, last accessed 2020/1/25. [Google Scholar]
  6. A.V. Krasnoshekov, M.D. Chapaykina, Analysis of the e-learning system by specialization (on the example of the national portal “open education”), Sovremennaya ekonomika, socialnye vyzovy I finansovye problemy XXI veka. SPbPU press, Saint-Petersburg, pp. 271-278 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  7. Online course “Basics of personal growth (for people with disabilities)”, https://openedu.ru/course/urfu/inclus_M1/, last accessed 2020/1/25. [Google Scholar]
  8. Online course “Development of body resources (for people with disabilities)”, https://openedu.ru/course/urfu/Inclus_M2/, last accessed 2020/1/25. [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Lang, Higher education for Deaf students: Research priorities in the new millennium, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(4), pp. 267-280 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J.K. Fernandes, S.S. Myers, Inclusive deaf studies: Barriers and pathways, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(1) pp. 17-29 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Knoors, M. Marschark, Teaching deaf learners, Oxford University Press, New York, NY (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Adler, B. Jacob, K. Kurz, R. Kushalnagar, Undergraduate research in mathematics with deaf and hard-of-hearing students: four perspectives, Journal of Mathematics 7(3), pp. 247–264 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Swanwick, M. Marschark, Enhancing education for deaf children: Research into practice and back again, Deafness and Education International, 12(4), pp. 217-235 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C.M. Pagliaro, Mathematics Reform in the Education of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students, American Annals of the Deaf 143(1), pp. 22-28 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C.M. Pagliaro, Mathematics Preparation and Professional Development of Deaf Education Teachers, American Annals of the Deaf 143(5), pp. 373-379 (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Berndsen, J. Luckner, Supporting students who are deaf or hard of hearing in general education classrooms: A Washington state case study, Communication Disorders Quarterly, 33(2), pp. 111-118 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Burgstahler, Opening doors or slamming them shut? Online learning practices and students with disabilities, Social Inclusion, 3(6), pp. 69-79 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Debevc, Z. Stepanovič, A. Holzinger, Development and evaluation of e-learning courses for deaf and hard of hearing students based on the advanced adapted pedagogical (API) index method, Interactive Learning Environments 22(1), pp. 33-50 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Nuccetelli, M.T. de Monte, Deaf people education: crossing linguistic borders through e-learning, Monachesi P., Gliozzo A.M., Westerhout E. (Eds.) LREC (Language Resources and Evaluation Conference), Valletta, Malta, pp. 24-28. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  20. E.A. Pizzuto, C.S. Bianchi, D. Capuano, G. Gianfreda, P. Rossini, Language resources and visual communications in a deaf-centered multimodal e-learning environment: Issues to be addressed, Monachesi P., Gliozzo A.M., Westerhout E. (Eds.) LREC (Language Resources and Evaluation Conference), Valletta, Malta, pp. 18-23, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Sutherland, T. Padden, Videoconferencing for deaf peoples: A case study of on-line education for deaf people, Deafness and Education International 1(2) 114-120 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. G. Valentine, T. Skelton, An umbilical cord to the word: The role of the Internet in D/deaf people’s information and communication practices, Information, Communication & Society 12(1), pp. 44-65 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Arnold, Deaf children and mathematics, Croatian Review of Rehabilitation Research, 32(1), pp. 65-72 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Nunes, C. Moreno, Is hearing impairment a cause of difficulties in learning mathematics?, Donlan C. (Ed.) The development of mathematical skills, pp. 227-254. Hove, UK (1998). [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Swanwick, A. Oddy, T. Roper, Mathematics and deaf children: an exploration of barriers to success, Deafness and Education International, 7(1), pp. 1-21 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. T. Nunes, C. Moreno, An intervention program for promoting deaf pupils’ achievement in mathematics, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(2), pp. 120-133 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Vesel, T. Robillard, Teaching Mathematics Vocabulary with an Interactive Signing Math Dictionary, Journal of Research on Technology in Education 45(4), pp. 361-389 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. C.M. Pagliaro, E. Ansell, Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students’ Problem-Solving Strategies With Signed Arithmetic Story Problems, American Annals of the Deaf 156(5), pp. 438-458 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.