Open Access
Issue
ITM Web Conf.
Volume 39, 2021
CIFEM'2020 – 3ème édition du Colloque International sur la Formation et l’Enseignement des Mathématiques et des sciences
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Approches pédagogiques et didactiques pour l'enseignement des sciences et techniques
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20213902001
Published online 11 May 2021
  1. I. Galili, Students’conceptualchange in geometrical optics. INT. J. SCI. EDUC, 18, 847–868(1996). [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Galili, S. Bendal, F. Goldberg, The effects of prior knowledge and Instruction on Understanding Image Formation. Res. In. Sci. Tea, 30, 1169–1187(1993). [Google Scholar]
  3. I. Galili, A. Hazan, Learners’ knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis. INT. J. SCI. EDUC, 22, 57–88(2000). [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Viennot, W. Kaminski, Can we evaluate the impact of a critical detail? the role of a Type of Diagram in Understanding Optical Imaging. INT. J. SCI. EDUC, 28, 1867–1885(2006). [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Fawaz, L. Viennot, Image optique et vision: Enquete en classe de premiere au liban. Bull.Union.Phy, 686, 1125–1146(1985). [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Arnantonaki, un modele precurseur sur la lumiere pour les eleves de 10 a 11 an : cadres theoriques ET methodologiques. Educ. J. Uni. Patras UNESCO Chair, 3, 74–83(2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Eshach, M.N. Fried, Should science be taugh in early childhood. J. Sci. Edu. Tech, 14, 316–336(2005). [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Potvin, Faire apprendre les sciences et la technologie a l’ecole, Epistemologie, didactique, sciences cognitives et neurosciences au service de l’enseignement. (Presse de l’universite Laval, Quebec, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Papandreou, M. Trezi, Exploring children’s ideas about natural phenomena in kindergarten classes: designing and evaluating ‘eliciting activities. Review of science, Mathematics and ICT EDUCATION. 2, 27–47 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  10. J.M. Boilevin, Renovation de l’enseignement des sciences physiques et formation des enseignants. 279 (Bruxelles: De Boeck, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Cordier, A. Tiberghien, A. Tiberghien, Des connaissances naives au savoir scientifique. 2–9 (CNRS. Unive. Lum Lyon, 2003). [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Droui, L’impact d’une simulation sur des dispositifs mobiles et en situation de collaboration sur la comprehension de l’effet photoelectrique au niveau collegial. (These de Doctorat, Universite Montreal, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  13. J.K. Gilbert, M. Watts, R.J. Osborne, Students’ conception. Phys. Educ, 17, 62–66 (1982) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Dumas Carre, A. Weil-Barais, K. Ravanis, F. Shourcheh, Interactions maitre-eleves en cours d’activites scientifiques a l’ecole maternelle : approche comparative. Bulle. Bulletin psychologie, 56, 494–508 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Siry and I. Kremer, Children Explain the Rainbow: Using Young Children’s Ideas to Guide Science Curricula. J.S.E.C.T, 20, 643–655 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. G.A. Winer, J.E. Cottrell, V. Gregg, J.S. Fournier, L.A. Bica, Fundamentally misunserstanding visual perception: Adults’belief in visual per-ception: Adults’ belief in visual emissions. Americ. Psyco, 75, 417–424(2002). [Google Scholar]
  17. N. J. Selley, Children's ideas on light and vision. INT. j. sci. EDUC. 18, 713–723(1996) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. John, J. Maisha Molepo, M. Chirwa, South African Learners’ Conceptual Understanding about Image Formation by Lenses. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 6, 1723–1736(2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. F.M. Goldberg, L.C. McDermott, An investigation of student understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or concave mirror. Am. J. Phys. 55, 108–119(1987). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Boustan Sarioglan, H. Kuqukozer, Comparison of high school students’ ideas about momentum and Impulse conceptions before and after instruction. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 116, 3771–3775 (2014). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.